Councils
A council is a saved group of advisors you ask together. Each advisor answers separately, without seeing the others, then you get one recommendation with the disagreement kept in. (In the files and commands, a saved council is called a bench.)
Ready-made councils
Six work as soon as you install:
| Name | Who sits on it | Use it for |
|---|---|---|
money | Munger, Naval, Hormozi | Pricing, savings, bets with real money |
deals | Voss, Munger, Cialdini | Negotiations, counteroffers, contracts |
strategy | Rumelt, Munger, Naval | Where to focus, what to stop, big plans |
relationship | Deida, Terry Real | Recurring fights, hard conversations |
work-design | Ferriss, Hormozi, Naval | How you spend your time and build your week |
shipping | Rayo OS, Naval, Rumelt | Should you build this, and will you finish it |
Call one:
/chiron:council money "should I move my emergency fund into index funds?"
In Codex and ChatGPT: Convene the money council: should I move my emergency fund into index funds?
Some of these pairs disagree on record (Voss and Munger on how a stuck deal moves, Ferriss and Hormozi on how hard to work, Deida and Terry Real on repair). That’s where a council is most useful.
Make your own
The easy way is to ask:
Make me a council called hiring with Munger, Voss and Kahneman.
Or use the command:
/chiron:bench create hiring munger voss kahneman
/chiron:bench list
/chiron:bench remove hiring
Add --global to make it available in every project. Add --depth full for a longer answer by default.
Your first saved council replaces the ready-made six. Chiron offers to copy them into your file first, so you keep them. To get the originals back later, delete your file.
A good size is 2 to 5 advisors. One advisor isn’t a council (use /chiron:ask). Six to eight works but gets noisy. More than eight is refused.
Pick advisors who see the problem differently. Two advisors from the same area mostly repeat each other.
A few worth trying
/chiron:bench create detectives house sherlock columbo --depth full
/chiron:bench create risk taleb kahneman munger
/chiron:bench create launch paul-graham hormozi thiel
- detectives for a bug, a broken number, or a story that doesn’t add up. Three different ways to find what’s wrong.
- risk before a bet that’s hard to undo.
- launch for what to build and how to sell it.
When to use a council, and when not to
Use a council when the decision is expensive or hard to undo, touches several areas at once (part money, part people), or sits on a known disagreement between advisors.
For anything smaller, one advisor is faster and usually just as good. If you’re not sure, ask without naming anyone and Chiron decides. It often says a council isn’t needed, which saves you a couple of minutes.
The file
Councils are plain YAML. You can edit the file directly; Chiron reads the same file.
benches:
hiring:
seats: [munger, voss, kahneman] # advisor ids, 2 to 8
chairman: neutral # who writes the recommendation: "neutral" or an advisor id
default_depth: quick # quick (short answer) or full
| Where | Scope |
|---|---|
~/.chiron/benches.yaml | Every project |
.chiron/benches.yaml in a project | Just that project. Wins if the same name exists in both |
~/.chiron/benches.yaml doesn’t exist yet | The ready-made six from the plugin are used |
An older file at ~/.claude/chiron/benches.yaml is still read, and the next save copies it into ~/.chiron/. In Cowork the file lives in the workspace’s .chiron/ folder; see Cowork.
Advisor ids are listed on the advisors page.
Chair it yourself
If you’ve built your own me advisor with /chiron:distill-me, you can put it on a council and let it write the final recommendation, weighing the others against your own priorities:
benches:
founder-calls:
seats: [me, munger, naval, rumelt]
chairman: me
default_depth: full
The other advisors still answer separately, and their disagreement stays visible, so you see exactly what you’re overruling. See Build an advisor.